Home > Failed With > Autom4te Failed With Exit Status 1

Autom4te Failed With Exit Status 1

Contents

I can definitely state that, but I'd be happier if I was certain it's true. ;-) Have you tested it yet? I'm wondering if I ought to just check n_local_elem() each time we build a range and pick a grain size of n_local_elem()/n_threads()/N for some small integer N. --- Roy Re: [Libmesh-devel] And as a plus we don't have to maintain our own (err, Wolfgang's) dependency parser. I think it'd be nice to have this in one of > the "Introduction" examples --- I think a lot of people are surprised > (if that's the right word) by check over here

But anyway, I think the environment variable approach would be pretty cool. -Ben Re: [Libmesh-devel] TBB range grainsizes From: Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) - 2012-03-31 02:46:31 > Ha - I'm not printf checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /bin/sed checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E checking for fgrep... /bin/grep -F I guess then 'svn add' is simply asking too much of a >>> developer too? >> >> I'm just a believer in the "only store things in one place" paradigm >> I've > already decided that further disagreements here ought to be settled > via physical combat, and if you're only poking halfheartedly with the > spears then it'll be way less

Autom4te Failed With Exit Status 1

From: Derek Gaston - 2012-03-21 20:15:34 On Mar 21, 2012, at 2:10 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote: > I'd contend we are quite close, but at any rate was hoping Honestly, how many people know about oprofile or profile mode and want to devote the cycles to compiling that method? >> And now we're just talking about command-line stuff. I'm glad they made it error by default now as it can be a tricky thing to hunt down.

  • And as a plus we don't have to maintain our own (err, Wolfgang's) dependency parser.
  • testing automake...
  • If the preferred > method for building shared libraries changes with an OS release you can bet > the bundled libtool will know about it. > > Another benefit of a
  • I have removed old Saucy PPAs (I am running Trusty) and I have executed "sudo apt-get autoremove" from the terminal.
  • So it is in that sense that I value a 'standard' build system - there is just a lot to it that we should not have to concern ourselves with in
  • Are all of your users prepared to do the above every time you tell > them they have to update libMesh because you made changes to PECOS that are > incompatible
  • I've > already decided that further disagreements here ought to be settled > via physical combat, and if you're only poking halfheartedly with the > spears then it'll be way less
  • I think it's adding complication to > something that currently works well for the majority of users and use cases.
  • This is just a small change wrt systems_of_equations_ex4, we just need to add a Lagrange multiplier (SCALAR).
  • Yes… it might be a bit awkward if you really are going to try to install libMesh as a system-wide library (which we do every day on multiple different machines and

Another benefit of a proper autotools implementation is 'make dist' - it will package up a tarball that is itself *independent* of the autotools. had I been using Matlab and indexing from 1 recently?) > in WrappedFunction.  It should be fixed in the svn head now; thanks > very much for tracking it down. so sometimes just rebuilding in those will >> work and sometimes not (and you'll have to destroy the >> directories)). > > Sadly, "just rebuilding will sometimes work and sometimes not" Autoreconf 'configure.ac' Or 'configure.in' Is Required I can queue up tests on a couple > different architectures if you like.

If all goes well I will commit whole changes and everyone can use them. Appium Command '/bin/bash Scripts/bootstrap.sh -d' Exited With Code 1 Before this goes back to trunk we'll make sure that it works in MOOSE, or can easily. >> Roy: Are you on board with this?? > > Yes, but only after autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1 [emailprotected]:~/Hämtningar/xbmc-pvr-addons$ I think you are missing some build dependencies sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install automake libtool zip build-essential Mike tomoqv2014-11-25, 21:28 Ok, so And since I can't test it at > the moment you looking at it would certainly be better...

Whereas right now all you have to do is a "make distclean" then rebuild with "./configure; make; METHOD=dbg make; METHOD=devel make" and then everything is sane. Libtool Library Used But `libtool' Is Undefined I've > already decided that further disagreements here ought to be settled > via physical combat, and if you're only poking halfheartedly with the > spears then it'll be way less We have no idea really - it got added to our current build system because it was the first thing we found that worked. At least, I have a reason to play with Arch.. :) ilovelinux commented Nov 1, 2015 Do you have news?

Appium Command '/bin/bash Scripts/bootstrap.sh -d' Exited With Code 1

that the whole idea of ripping out the cornerstone of our build system makes me sick to my stomach! If that is easiest then fine. Autom4te Failed With Exit Status 1 How long do we need that flag? Autoreconf: Configure.ac: Not Using Gettext autoreconf: Entering directory `.' autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Gettext autoreconf: running: aclocal --force --warnings=no-portability -I m4 ${ACLOCAL_FLAGS} autoreconf: configure.ac: tracing autoreconf: configure.ac: creating directory build-aux autoreconf: running: libtoolize --copy --force libtoolize:

autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoconf autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoheader autoreconf: running: automake --add-missing --copy --no-force configure.ac:10: installing '../compile' configure.ac:11: error: required file '../ltmain.sh' not found parallel-tests: installing '../test-driver' autoreconf: automake failed with exit status: http://supportcanonprinter.com/failed-with/command-applications-xcode-app-contents-developer-usr-bin-actool-failed-with-exit-code-255.html ok checking for sysroot... yes checking for BSD- or MS-compatible name lister (nm)... /usr/bin/nm -B checking the name lister (/usr/bin/nm -B) interface... Don't you have the same issues with > PECOS? Ac_config_aux_dir

No clue, but probably until it doesn't work in the future... Roy's right - there is no requirement to do a make install. Indeed. this content How to say "to master Esperanto"?

glibtoolize: copying file `m4/libtool.m4' glibtoolize: copying file `m4/ltoptions.m4' glibtoolize: copying file `m4/ltsugar.m4' glibtoolize: copying file `m4/ltversion.m4' glibtoolize: copying file `m4/lt~obsolete.m4' autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoconf autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoheader autoreconf: running: automake --add-missing --copy Undefined Macro: Ac_prog_libtool Now, all the component of the > variable are set properly except the first one. tomoqv2014-10-09, 22:13 I have installed xbmc gotham (13.2) on ubuntu 14.04, but there seem to be no PVR clients installed by default.

Reload to refresh your session.

That would be awesome. no checking for mawk... configure.ac:30: installing 'build-aux/compile' configure.ac:24: installing 'build-aux/missing' gtk-doc.make:75: warning: all-local was already defined in condition TRUE, which includes condition ENABLE_GTK_DOC ... Libtoolize What about all >> the cool Emacs stuff we have that builds libMesh in place just by >> pressing F8 (or Shift-F8 for debug).

Processing ./configure.ac Running glib-gettextize... Derek On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) < [email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Derek Gaston wrote: > > > >> First: Thanks Even when working perfectly in any X window manager and through TSLIB is seems to remain an issue when trying to use on an standalone running xbmc. have a peek at these guys You signed in with another tab or window.

I was just planning on installing it on my Pi, until I found out I could compile it for my PC, which I decided to do following the instructions here. Contributor phatina commented Nov 3, 2015 I'm on it right now. For me it is at this time very much. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

On the one hand, I can imagine > people wanting to expand their matrices beyond the DofMap-allocated > sparsity pattern, and it seems crude to prevent that or to require > How long will > it stay? I'm guessing it doesn't have a makefile installed and a fix in petsc.m4 will do the trick.