Home > The Specified > The Specified Interface Is Not Declared

The Specified Interface Is Not Declared

duplicated the interface code) all the subroutine interfaces in a few modules, and used these modules everywhere. His reponse: Quote: I am curious what the user meant by “F2008 conventions” because I did not see anything in the language spec that would indicate F2008 allowing the user to New chapters cover multithreaded network programming, I/O, HTML parsing and display, the Java Mail API, the Java Secure Sockets Extension, and more. kept for other use REAL :: z fvec_p=>y

Furthermore, section, p.260 + corrigendum 5: "A procedure shall not have more than one explicit specific interface in a given scoping unit, except that if the interface is accessed by Is this standard? See ASP.NET Ajax CDN Terms of Use – http://www.asp.net/ajaxlibrary/CDN.ashx. ]]> more hot questions question feed about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / Arts Culture / Recreation Science

Isn't it a key point in our discussion? > You could also ask at the comp.lang.fortran newsgroup where > (among others) the editor of the Fortran 2003 standard answers such questions. a given vector SUBROUTINE MajorSolver(ans,x,fvec_p,proc_p) IMPLICIT NONE REAL, DIMENSION(:), POINTER :: ans REAL, DIMENSION(:), INTENT(IN) :: x REAL, DIMENSION(:), POINTER :: fvec_p PROCEDURE(functions_system), POINTER :: proc_p PROCEDURE(middle_function_template), POINTER :: proc3p REAL, We appreciate your feedback. Comment 4 Sebastien Bardeau 2011-11-23 13:56:19 UTC (In reply to comment #3) > For links to the standards see: > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranStandards Ok thank you for this link, very useful. > I

  • Out of memory (Error 31001) Out of memory (Error 7) Out of memory; some watches might have been deleted Out of resources Out of stack space (Error 28) Out of string
  • Well, it is the key point of the discussion.
  • Thanks for your other explanations and examples, I keep them in mind for further discussions, here or on the comp.lang.fortran newsgroup .
  • Join today Support Terms of Use *Trademarks Privacy Cookies Publications Intel® Developer Zone Newsletter Intel® Parallel Universe Magazine Look for us on: FacebookTwitterGoogle+LinkedInYouTube English简体中文EspañolPortuguês Rate Us current community chat Stack Overflow
  • Comment 7 Tobias Burnus 2011-11-24 14:04:20 UTC (In reply to comment #6) > "Within a scoping unit, identifiers of entities in the following classes: > (1) ..., abstract interfaces, generic interfaces,
  • I’m curious what the user meant by “F2008 conventions” in case I’m just missing something here.
  • Please ask him for a clarification. - Mat Back to top catfishwolfJoined: 31 Mar 2013Posts: 8 Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2013 6:58 pm Post subject: mkcolg wrote: Hi Li, Our engineer
  • Yes No Additional feedback? 1500 characters remaining Submit Skip this Thank you!
  • Many expected that it would be quickly implemented - much earlier than the rest of Fortran 2003.

Juan Mon, 07/29/2013 - 18:28 Hi, everyone,  I tried to compile the source code below but the Intel Visual Fortran compiler 2013 issues a compiler error saying that error #8169: The specified The Intel Visual Fortran compiler 2013 issues a compiler error saying that error #8169: The specified interface is not declared @ the second abstract interface, while the same source code can The reason for this is that the 'ifort' compiler does not see the variables in Interface. Well, it (and the other compilers) could still be blamed for not implementing submodules earlier. (For instance, the authors of "Fortran 95/2003 explained" assumed that it would get implemented before most

Ending the program now could cause errors in those programs. You can obtain the latest version from www.microsoft.com This interaction between compiled and design environment components is not supported This key is already associated with an element of this collection (Error Comment 1 Tobias Burnus 2011-11-22 16:09:19 UTC Well, that one now gets a diagnostic and didn't get one before is a change, but the question is whether it is a progression F2008 Host association (from, first paragraph, Host association page 443 in F2008 language spec): An interface body interface that is not a separate interface body has access via host association

Isn't it a key point in our > > discussion? > > Well, it is the key point of the discussion. Description Sebastien Bardeau 2011-11-22 12:30:10 UTC Created attachment 25881 [details] Declare a subroutine interface and use this interface in the subroutine This a regression which appeared in the last months: problem This violates the scoping rules of the language. We must not be the only ones trying to write and share among files the specific interfaces to Fortran77-based procedures...

Thanks, Li Code: MODULE toolbox Is this page helpful? Failed to load control 'item1' from 'item2'. The Programmatic ID must be 39 characters or less.

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/ef3900ab261c5cd9 Suggested workaround/solution: subroutine mysub() use MYINTERFACES, ignore_me => mysub Comment 10 Sebastien Bardeau 2011-11-29 14:33:08 UTC Indeed this is a workaround that we will probably adopt. Comment 5 Tobias Burnus 2011-11-23 16:51:39 UTC (In reply to comment #4) > So basically you mean that in the gfortran implementation the subroutine name > is part of the scope Comment 2 Sebastien Bardeau 2011-11-23 09:22:12 UTC Well, we are definitely interested in what the standard says exactly. To correct this, uncheck 'Remove information about unused ActiveX Controls' in Project Options.

How do you define sequences that converge to infinity? Based on the above definition, the exception doesn’t apply to the user’s code, so I believe IMPORT is required under both F2003 and F2008 conventions. Please check the trnslate.log file for more information. Though, he's wondering why you think this would be ok under F2008.

the module itself). In an ideal world, the compiler would assume the interface "foo" refers to the subroutine "foo", and the compiler will have by the way the possibility to check if they are Name is already in use 'item1' is an invalid key.

Illegal parameter.

Some or all of the properties might not be set correctly. So I develop a module called Var to do fix that. My compiler version is ifort 12.1.0 MODULE DEMO USE VAR INTERFACE SUBROUTINE callback_prototype(callbackID) USE VAR CHARACTER(*) :: callbackID END SUBROUTINE callback_prototype END INTERFACE PROCEDURE( callback_prototype ), POINTER :: f_ptr => NULL() Thanks for the comments Tobias.

In addition we wrote (i.e. Line 'item1': Class name too long; truncated to 'item2'. Can't write object because it does not support persistence. KühnSınırlı önizleme - 1999Tüm Kitap Arama sonuçları » Yazar hakkında(2000)Elliotte Rusty Harold is an adjunct professor of computer science at Polytechnic University in Brooklyn, New York, where he lectures on object-oriented

Parent menu cannot have a shortcut key. The project can't be loaded The project name is too long. return the innder product of the vector proc_p evaluated at x FUNCTION MiddleFunction(x,fvec_p,proc_p) IMPLICIT NONE REAL, DIMENSION(:), INTENT(IN) :: x REAL, DIMENSION(:), POINTER :: fvec_p PROCEDURE(functions_system), POINTER :: proc_p REAL :: Yes it will be interesting to have their point of view depending on how we finally agree on the standard interpretation.

Line 'item1': Property 'item2' in 'item3' could not be loaded. Please ensure that all add-ins have been installed correctly. End program at this time? Tsang,Paul J.

In addition, he is the author and coauthor of numerous books, the most recent of which are "The XML Bible" (John Wiley & Sons, 2001) and "XML in a Nutshell" (O'Reilly, Line 'item1': Control name too long; truncated to 'item2'. This control may be incompatible with your application.